The threats were there. They just weren't visible.

A global iGaming operator was handling around 800 threats a year manually. After working with PhishFort, they found over 4,700 in the first twelve months and took down nearly all of them.

4,700+ Malicious assets detected and actioned
98.9% Takedown success rate
38 Average hours from detection to offline
6ร— More threats found than manual monitoring
Confidential iGaming Operator
Online Casino and Sports Betting ยท Multi-jurisdiction ยท Europe / LATAM
Business Overview

A licensed operator with millions of active players and a brand worth impersonating

iGaming platforms sit at the intersection of real money and digital trust. For players, everything depends on knowing the site they’re using is the real one. A convincing fake costs them their deposit, their credentials, and sometimes a lot more.

This operator ran casino, live betting, and sports products across Europe and Latin America, with millions of registered players and hundreds of affiliate partners driving daily traffic. The platform processed real-money deposits around the clock and had a presence in major mobile app stores across multiple markets.

Before working with PhishFort, the security team was mostly reactive. They acted on player complaints, kept tabs on a small number of known lookalike domains, and manually reviewed apps that got flagged. By the time a threat surfaced, it had usually been live for days. How much was running beneath the surface was anyone’s guess.

The Challenge

Five attack vectors. All running simultaneously. None fully visible.

What makes iGaming particularly hard to defend is that there’s no single threat to focus on. Attackers hit different stages of the player journey at the same time, each using a different method, hosted in a different place, and requiring a different takedown process.

โš™๏ธ

Third-Party Script Injection

Platforms load between 40 and 70 JavaScript dependencies per session. Attackers compromise shared libraries to skim payment inputs and player data at the browser layer, which network firewalls never see.
๐Ÿค–

AI-Driven Bonus Abuse

LLM-generated synthetic identities flooded support queues with convincing dispute narratives, overwhelming manual review teams and opening the door to fraudulent withdrawals at scale.
๐ŸŽฃ

AI-Enhanced Phishing and Account Takeover

Deepfake-assisted phishing campaigns targeted active players with highly personalized messages. Once credentials were stolen, automated tools cashed out wallets within hours.
๐Ÿ“ฑ

Fake App Distribution

Lookalike apps in unofficial stores, and occasionally in major ones, replicated the platform’s interface closely enough to harvest credentials and redirect deposits before anyone caught them.
๐ŸŒ

Lookalike Domain Networks

Attackers registered domain clusters across multiple registrars and ccTLDs, rotating infrastructure fast enough to stay ahead of manual reporting processes.
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Regulatory and Compliance Exposure

Every active phishing site was a potential reportable event under the operator’s gaming licences. At the volumes they were dealing with, tracking it manually wasn’t viable.
Before PhishFort
~800
Threats handled per year, all reactive and manually reported by players or affiliate partners
After PhishFort
4,700+
Malicious assets detected and actioned in the first year, automated across all channels
The Solution

Detection and enforcement across every surface, handled end to end

PhishFort came in as an extension of the security team, not another tool that generates alerts for analysts to chase. The goal was simple: find threats, validate them, and take them down without the operator having to manage the process.

01

Brand Asset Setup and Continuous Scanning

The operator’s brand assets were onboarded, including domain patterns, logo variants, app names, and affiliate identifiers, and used to configure round-the-clock scanning across the open web, app stores, Telegram, and dark web paste sites. Active threats started surfacing within hours of going live.
02

Automated Pre-Triage and Human Analyst Review

AI-flagged detections were pre-triaged to cut noise before reaching human review. Validated cases were classified by attack type, severity, and registrar jurisdiction so the highest-impact threats got addressed first.
03

Multi-Channel Enforcement and Blocklisting

PhishFort’s team packaged evidence for each confirmed threat and escalated across hosting providers, domain registrars, app stores, and social platforms using established relationships and evidence templates built specifically for gaming cases. Every confirmed domain was added to the PhishFort Global Blocklist.
04

Walled-Garden and Telegram Takedowns

Impersonation channels on Telegram and other closed platforms got dedicated enforcement. PhishFort’s playbook for this type of abuse, with evidence packaging optimised for each platform’s support teams, consistently produced faster results than the operator escalating directly.
05

Workflow Integration and Compliance Reporting

Detection updates, case status, and takedown outcomes fed into a dashboard that fit inside the operator’s existing security workflow. The compliance team got a clean, auditable record of active threat management across every regulated market.
Attack-to-Takedown: Anatomy of a Single Threat
Hour 0
Attacker registers lookalike domain
A new domain mirroring the operator’s brand is registered via a privacy-protected ccTLD registrar. The site begins serving a pixel-perfect clone of the platform’s login and deposit flow.
Hour 2
PhishFort scanner flags the domain
Continuous monitoring detects the domain pattern match and visual similarity. The case enters pre-triage automatically.
Hour 4
Analyst confirms & evidence package assembled
A PhishFort analyst validates the classification, captures screenshots, WHOIS data, and hosting info. An evidence bundle is prepared for registrar escalation.
Hour 6
Escalation submitted to registrar & host
Simultaneous takedown requests are sent to the domain registrar and hosting provider with jurisdiction-appropriate abuse templates.
Hour 38 (avg.)
Domain goes offline
The threat is resolved. The domain is added to the PhishFort Global Blocklist, protecting all users industry-wide from the same infrastructure.
The Impact

Threats neutralised at a scale the internal team could never have reached alone

Within the first twelve months, the operator’s threat posture changed from reactive and fragmented to systematic and comprehensive. The volume of threats actioned increased by more than six times, not because the attack surface grew, but because it was now fully visible.

The internal security team’s workload shifted meaningfully. Player complaints about phishing that previously triggered a manual investigation process frequently arrived to find the relevant domain already offline. Support ticket volume related to account takeover dropped as phishing infrastructure was removed faster than it could convert victims.

The operator’s compliance function gained a defensible record of active threat management across all licensed jurisdictions, critical in a regulatory environment where the obligation to protect player data extends to the digital environment surrounding the platform.

4,700+
Threats neutralised vs. ~800 per year handled manually before
98.9%
Takedown success rate across all confirmed cases
38h
Average time from detection to site going offline
6ร—
More threats found than prior monitoring approach
“We were dealing with an attack surface we couldn’t fully see. The volume of what PhishFort identified in the first weeks made clear that our previous approach was leaving thousands of players exposed. The shift from reactive to automated enforcement changed what our team could actually spend time on.”
Head of Security Confidential iGaming Operator