When security leaders and brand managers speak about “digital risk”, they may not be talking about the same thing. To a CISO, “digital risk” may mean compromised employee credentials, phishing sites posing as legitimate sites, or fake apps pretending to be legitimate apps. To a brand manager or outside counsel, “digital risk” may refer to counterfeit products sold online, fraudulent social media accounts, or unauthorized use of written trademarks.
While both are correct, they are often addressing two distinct but overlapping spheres: Digital Risk Protection Services (DRPS), as defined by Gartner, and Brand Protection, another respective category focused on IP and consumer trust.
Understanding the nuances of Digital Risk Protection Service DRPS vs Brand Protection is crucial for developing an effective security and brand strategy. This guide will help cut through the jargon and vendor marketing spin to clarify the differences, identify the overlaps, and ultimately provide a simple checklist for picking the best approach (or both).
A Capability Map of DRPS vs Brand Protection
Before getting into the checklists, it is important to take one step back. DRPS and Brand Protection are not merely “feature lists”, they are “a way of thinking” about risk from an external lens. DRPS emerged out of security operations and threat intelligence. Brand Protection originated out of legal and marketing teams protecting the brand from counterfeit products. Today, we see these two worlds collide, since attackers don’t care about categories; they only care about what they can exploit. A comprehensive understanding of DRPS vs Brand Protection helps in implementing effective risk management. For the sake of simplicity, we’ve broken down the capabilities as comparison chart:
| Category | DRPS | Brand Protection | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Discovery | Dark web leaks, stolen data, shadow IT assets | Counterfeit products, fake listings | Phishing sites, fake social accounts, rogue apps |
| Disruption/Takedown | Domains, phishing infra, impersonations | Marketplaces, ads, app stores | Social media & websites |
| Focus Areas | Executive protection, SOC integration, external attack surface | Trademark/IP enforcement, revenue loss prevention | Customer trust, impersonation removal |
Conclusion: The DRPS is created for security and SOC teams which provides a look into cyber risks across open, deep and dark web. Brand Protection is created for brands and legal teams which enables to remove counterfeits, enforce IP rights and protect consumers. The overlap is where both purposes meet: phishing, impersonations, rogue apps and counterfeit websites.
Yes, sometimes the best way to comprehend, is to visualize it. Think of DRPS as a flashlight washing across the dark corners of the internet forums, dark web leaks, perpetrator chatter. Brand Protection is like a spotlight on marketplaces, advertisements, and app stores where your consumer and trademark protected areas are being violated. This is a simple venn diagram that can help you visualize the two:
The overlap is spot on: whatever you call it, attackers are stealing money, data, and trust through the use of impersonation practices.
Takeaway: The diagram illustrates the benefits of companies needing both surveillance lenses; with just DRPS you could miss underground cyber threats; with out brand protection you could be missing cyber threats targeting consumers and/or brand trust. Depending on your needs, you can figure out quickly if it’s DRPS vs Brand Protection.
Buyer’s Checklist for DRPS vs. Brand Protection
When it comes to buying decisions, the theory does not work – a pragmatic checklist is required. Here’s an easy way to make that decision:
If your primary focus is Security Risk Mitigation then DRPS is your ideal solution:
- Dark web, forums, and credential leak coverage
- Phishing infrastructure and some monitoring of shadow IT assets (not to be confused with EASM!)
- Executive/VIP abuse on both across web, social, and dark web
- Integrations with SIEM/SOAR/SOC workflows
- Automated takedowns across all domains/social/app stores
Why it matters: A security incident originated outside of your walls. DRPS will allow you to intercept it prior to it being in your inbox or systems.
If your primary focus is Brand/IP Integrity than go with a pure-play Brand Protection solution:
- Scams or counterfeit detection
- Trademark / IP enforcement workflows
- Rogue applications and fake ads
- Anti-Fraud or Anti-Brand Abuse
- Protection of Revenue
Why it matters: Customers can’t tell the difference between your authentic listing and a fake one. Protecting integrity is protecting your potential revenue.
If you need both:
- A single dashboard that highlights coverage for dark-web leaks and counterfeit/IP infringement
- Cursory identified takedown service levels for phishing and fake listings
- Accessibility to serve both security and legal/marketing teams
Why it matters: Most mature organizations get to this point—because threats do not operate in silos. The alignment across teams is extremely valuable. Rather than a DRPS vs Brand Protection mindset, integration both solutions provides a much more unified defense.
How to Get Started in 3 Easy Steps
There’s always going to be analysis paralysis when comparing vendors. Instead, consider the roadmap to a 30-day sprint: (please)
- Define Goals → Is your goal security incidents focused (SOC focused), or is it revenue/brand abuse program (Corporate/Marketing focused)? Start here.
- Check Coverage → For a DRPS service ask if they are monitoring metadata for leaks; for a Brand Protection provider/partner ask if they have established workflows for IP and platform relationships (i.e. LinkedIn, GoDaddy, Coinbase, etc) established.
- Trial and Measure → Begin with a trial. Every 30 days you should recognize some type of progress with detected impersonations, initiated takedowns, or removal of digital abuse targeting your organization and people. Measure time-to-detect, and time-to-takedown.
Key takeaway: If you treat it as a sprint, you’ll get results pretty quick and you won’t have to sit through vendor deck after vendor deck.
Vendor Shortlists for DRPS vs. Brand Protection
There is a multitude of vendors, so here is a practical way to begin your DRPS vs Brand Protection shortlist:
DRPS vendors include:
ZeroFox — DRP platform with extensive disruption and a team that specializes in Dark Web.
Fortra | PhishLabs — managed DRP and takedowns as well as phishing awareness training.
SOCRadar — DRPS features are included but they mostly specialize in threat intelligence.
Brand protection vendors include:
Doppel — An A16z backed startup that has been getting more attention in brand protection
Netcraft — A legacy brand protection vendor that also helps with DNS lookup
Red Points – A more economy solution to brand and counterfeit protection
Many vendors encompass both categories. Your question is: Do they have the depth where I will actually need them? As you navigate through the complexities of DRPS vs Brand Protection, clarity and alignment are key.
Among these options, PhishFort stands out because it bridges both worlds, DRPS and Brand Protection, in a single, streamlined platform. Unlike point solutions that either focus on underground cyber risks or narrow brand/IP enforcement, PhishFort delivers AI-powered detection and the industry’s best takedown services at a over 98% success rate. This dual capability means security teams, brand managers, and legal stakeholders can all work from the same playbook, eliminating silos and accelerating response. For organizations that don’t want to choose between protecting data and protecting trust, PhishFort provides a unified path forward that keeps you covered in both arenas.
Conclusion
Digital risks have effectively blurred the border between security and brand. A compromised database on the dark web is a security risk, while a counterfeit operation on Amazon is a brand risk—both threaten trust, revenue and resilience. If your SOC is inundated with phishing complaints and have had credentials leaked, you need DRPS. If your marketing and legal teams are filing multiple complaints a day on counterfeit takedowns and scam, then brand protection is at the top.
If your rapidly growing company is in both situations, at some point, you need a platform to help with both. Ultimately, understanding DRPS vs Brand Protection is essential for organizations and to effectively navigate these risks, a balanced approach to DRPS vs Brand Protection is often the best path forward. At the end of the day, it is not about the Gartner categories or vendor identification but it is about the trust in your company as you do business online.
Table of contents:
